Fixes AIGOV-141
The `coder support bundle` command previously required admin permissions
(`Read DeploymentConfig`) and would abort entirely for non-admin
`member` users with:
```
failed authorization check: cannot Read DeploymentValues
```
This change makes the command **degrade gracefully** instead of failing
outright.
<details>
<summary>
Changes
</summary>
### `support/support.go`
- **`Run()`**: The authorization check for `Read DeploymentValues` is
now a soft warning instead of a hard gate. Unauthenticated users (401)
still fail, but authenticated users with insufficient permissions
proceed with reduced data.
- **`DeploymentInfo()`**: `DeploymentConfig` and `DebugHealth` fetches
now handle 403/401 responses gracefully, matching the existing pattern
used by `DeploymentStats`, `Entitlements`, and `HealthSettings`.
- **`NetworkInfo()`**: Coordinator debug and tailnet debug fetches now
check response status codes for 403/401 before reading the body.
### `cli/support.go`
- **`summarizeBundle()`**: No longer returns early when `Config` or
`HealthReport` is nil. Instead prints warnings and continues summarizing
available data (e.g., netcheck).
### Tests
- `MissingPrivilege` → `MemberNoWorkspace`: Asserts member users can
generate a bundle successfully with degraded admin-only data.
- `NoPrivilege` → `MemberCanGenerateBundle`: Asserts the CLI produces a
valid zip bundle for member users.
- All existing tests continue to pass (`NoAuth`, `OK`, `OK_NoWorkspace`,
`DontPanic`, etc.).
## Behavior matrix
| User type | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| **Admin** | Full bundle | Full bundle (no change) |
| **Member** | Hard error | Bundle with degraded admin-only data |
| **Unauthenticated** | Hard error | Hard error (no change) |
Related to PRODUCT-182
I just added support for rendering GFM alerts inside of numbered lists
in coder.com (see https://github.com/coder/coder.com/pull/328), and
noticed that these plain blockquotes should probably be alerts.
This should cover all the missing alerts. I found them by searching for
the regex `^\s*>\s` within docs/**/*.md
Is `[!NOTE]` the correct type for these? Or do we want to use
tip/important/etc?
- @mtojek CONTRIBUTING.md
- @johnstcn support-bundle.md
- @matifali gateway.md
As part of an information architecture overhaul, this PR reorganizes the
About section and adds a Support section (but not content to it yet)
[preview](https://coder.com/docs/@docs-ia-about/about)
this PR is intentionally limited in scope so that we can ship meaningful
changes faster and followup PRs should include:
- [ ] edit + overhaul the About page
- [ ] decide on the `start` directory
- [ ] ~screenshots page updates~ (this should happen July or later)
redirects PR: https://github.com/coder/coder.com/pull/944
---------
Co-authored-by: EdwardAngert <17991901+EdwardAngert@users.noreply.github.com>
Cian Johnston