This does ~95% of the backend work required to integrate the AI work.
Most left to integrate from the tasks branch is just frontend, which
will be a lot smaller I believe.
The real difference between this branch and that one is the abstraction
-- this now attaches statuses to apps, and returns the latest status
reported as part of a workspace.
This change enables us to have a similar UX to in the tasks branch, but
for agents other than Claude Code as well. Any app can report status
now.
* Adds `codersdk.ExperimentWebPush` (`web-push`)
* Adds a `coderd/webpush` package that allows sending native push
notifications via `github.com/SherClockHolmes/webpush-go`
* Adds database tables to store push notification subscriptions.
* Adds an API endpoint that allows users to subscribe/unsubscribe, and
send a test notification (404 without experiment, excluded from API docs)
* Adds server CLI command to regenerate VAPID keys (note: regenerating
the VAPID keypair requires deleting all existing subscriptions)
---------
Co-authored-by: Kyle Carberry <kyle@carberry.com>
- Update go.mod to use Go 1.24.1
- Update GitHub Actions setup-go action to use Go 1.24.1
- Fix linting issues with golangci-lint by:
- Updating to golangci-lint v1.57.1 (more compatible with Go 1.24.1)
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <claude@anthropic.com>
In the presence of multiple devcontainers, it would be nice to
differentiate them by name. This change inherits the resource name from
terraform.
Refs #17076
Records the Device ID, Device OS and Coder Desktop version to telemetry.
These values are provided by the Coder Desktop client in the StartRequest method of the VPN protocol. We render them as an HTTP header to transmit to Coderd, where they are decoded and added to telemetry.
This change allows specifying devcontainers in terraform and plumbs it
through to the agent via agent manifest.
This will be used for autostarting devcontainers in a workspace.
Depends on coder/terraform-provider-coder#368
Updates #16423
[Resolve this issue](https://github.com/coder/internal/issues/506)
Add a mark-all-as-read endpoint which is marking as read all
notifications that are not read for the authenticated user.
Also adds the DB logic.
* Improves separation of concerns between `runDockerInspect` and
`convertDockerInspect`: `runDockerInspect` now just runs the command and
returns the output, while `convertDockerInspect` now does all of the
conversion and parsing logic.
* Improves testing of `convertDockerInspect` using real test fixtures.
* Fixes issue where the container port is returned instead of the host
port.
* Updates UI to link to correct host port. Container port is still
displayed in the button text, but the HostIP:HostPort is shown in a
popover.
* Adds stories for workspace agent UI
This PR is part of the inbox notifications topic, and rely on previous
PRs merged - it adds :
- Endpoints to :
- WS : watch new inbox notifications
- REST : list inbox notifications
- REST : update the read status of a notification
Also, this PR acts as a follow-up PR from previous work and :
- fix DB query issues
- fix DBMem logic to match DB
The experimental functions in `golang.org/x/exp/slices` are now
available in the standard library since Go 1.21.
Reference: https://go.dev/doc/go1.21#slices
Signed-off-by: Eng Zer Jun <engzerjun@gmail.com>
Fixes: https://github.com/coder/internal/issues/377
Added an additional SSH listener on port 22, so the agent now listens on both, port one and port 22.
---
Change-Id: Ifd986b260f8ac317e37d65111cd4e0bd1dc38af8
Signed-off-by: Thomas Kosiewski <tk@coder.com>
Using negative permissions, this role prevents a user's ability to
create & delete a workspace within a given organization.
Workspaces are uniquely owned by an org and a user, so the org has to
supercede the user permission with a negative permission.
# Use case
Organizations must be able to restrict a member's ability to create a
workspace. This permission is implicitly granted (see
https://github.com/coder/coder/issues/16546#issuecomment-2655437860).
To revoke this permission, the solution chosen was to use negative
permissions in a built in role called `WorkspaceCreationBan`.
# Rational
Using negative permissions is new territory, and not ideal. However,
workspaces are in a unique position.
Workspaces have 2 owners. The organization and the user. To prevent
users from creating a workspace in another organization, an [implied
negative
permission](https://github.com/coder/coder/blob/36d9f5ddb3d98029fee07d004709e1e51022e979/coderd/rbac/policy.rego#L172-L192)
is used. So the truth table looks like: _how to read this table
[here](https://github.com/coder/coder/blob/36d9f5ddb3d98029fee07d004709e1e51022e979/coderd/rbac/README.md#roles)_
| Role (example) | Site | Org | User | Result |
|-----------------|------|------|------|--------|
| non-org-member | \_ | N | YN\_ | N |
| user | \_ | \_ | Y | Y |
| WorkspaceBan | \_ | N | Y | Y |
| unauthenticated | \_ | \_ | \_ | N |
This new role, `WorkspaceCreationBan` is the same truth table condition
as if the user was not a member of the organization (when doing a
workspace create/delete). So this behavior **is not entirely new**.
<details>
<summary>How to do it without a negative permission</summary>
The alternate approach would be to remove the implied permission, and
grant it via and organization role. However this would add new behavior
that an organizational role has the ability to grant a user permissions
on their own resources?
It does not make sense for an org role to prevent user from changing
their profile information for example. So the only option is to create a
new truth table column for resources that are owned by both an
organization and a user.
| Role (example) | Site | Org |User+Org| User | Result |
|-----------------|------|------|--------|------|--------|
| non-org-member | \_ | N | \_ | \_ | N |
| user | \_ | \_ | \_ | \_ | N |
| WorkspaceAllow | \_ | \_ | Y | \_ | Y |
| unauthenticated | \_ | \_ | \_ | \_ | N |
Now a user has no opinion on if they can create a workspace, which feels
a little wrong. A user should have the authority over what is theres.
There is fundamental _philosophical_ question of "Who does a workspace
belong to?". The user has some set of autonomy, yet it is the
organization that controls it's existence. A head scratcher 🤔
</details>
## Will we need more negative built in roles?
There are few resources that have shared ownership. Only
`ResourceOrganizationMember` and `ResourceGroupMember`. Since negative
permissions is intended to revoke access to a shared resource, then
**no.** **This is the only one we need**.
Classic resources like `ResourceTemplate` are entirely controlled by the
Organization permissions. And resources entirely in the user control
(like user profile) are only controlled by `User` permissions.
![Uploading Screenshot 2025-02-26 at 22.26.52.png…]()
---------
Co-authored-by: Jaayden Halko <jaayden.halko@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: ケイラ <mckayla@hey.com>
`ServeProvisionerDaemonRequest` has had an ID field for quite a while
now.
This field is only used for telemetry purposes; the actual daemon ID is
created upon insertion in the database. There's no reason to set it, and
it's confusing to do so. Deprecating the field and removing references
to it.
Builds on top of https://github.com/coder/coder/pull/16623/ and wires up
the ReconnectingPTY server. This does nothing to wire up the web
terminal yet but the added test demonstrates the functionality working.
Other changes:
* Refactors and moves the `SystemEnvInfo` interface to the
`agent/usershell` package to address follow-up from
https://github.com/coder/coder/pull/16623#discussion_r1967580249
* Marks `usershellinfo.Get` as deprecated. Consumers should use the
`EnvInfoer` interface instead.
---------
Co-authored-by: Mathias Fredriksson <mafredri@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Danny Kopping <danny@coder.com>
Third and final PR to address
https://github.com/coder/coder/issues/16230.
This PR enables GitHub OAuth2 login by default on new deployments.
Combined with https://github.com/coder/coder/pull/16629, this will allow
the first admin user to sign up with GitHub rather than email and
password.
We take care not to enable the default on deployments that would upgrade
to a Coder version with this change.
To disable the default provider an admin can set the
`CODER_OAUTH2_GITHUB_DEFAULT_PROVIDER` env variable to false.
Niche edge case, assumes access_token is jwt.
Some `access_token`s are JWT's with potential useful claims.
These claims would be nearly equivalent to `user_info` claims.
This is not apart of the oauth spec, so this feature should not be
loudly advertised. If using this feature, alternate solutions are preferred.
Provisioner key permissions were never any different than provisioners.
Merging them for a cleaner permission story until they are required (if
ever) to be seperate.
This removed `ResourceProvisionerKey` from RBAC and just uses the
existing `ResourceProvisioner`.
First PR in a series to address
https://github.com/coder/coder/issues/16230.
Introduces support for logging in via the [GitHub OAuth2 Device
Flow](https://docs.github.com/en/apps/oauth-apps/building-oauth-apps/authorizing-oauth-apps#device-flow).
It's previously been possible to configure external auth with the device
flow, but it's not been possible to use it for logging in. This PR
builds on the existing support we had to extend it to sign ins.
When a user clicks "sign in with GitHub" when device auth is configured,
they are redirected to the new `/login/device` page, which makes the
flow possible from the client's side. The recording below shows the full
flow.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/90c06f1f-e42f-43e9-a128-462270c80fdd
I've also manually tested that it works for converting from
password-based auth to oauth.
Device auth can be enabled by a deployment's admin by setting the
`CODER_OAUTH2_GITHUB_DEVICE_FLOW` env variable or a corresponding config
setting.
This change adds a new `ReportConnection` endpoint to the `agentapi`.
The protocol version was bumped previously, so it has been omitted here.
This allows the agent to report connection events, for example when the
user connects to the workspace via SSH or VS Code.
Updates #15139
This commit adds new audit resource types for workspace agents and
workspace apps, as well as connect/disconnect and open/close actions.
The idea is that we will log new audit events for connecting to the
agent via SSH/editor.
Likewise, we will log openings of `coder_app`s.
This change also introduces support for filtering by `request_id`.
Updates #15139
This change adds provisioner daemon ID filter to the provisioner daemons
endpoint, and also implements the limiting to 50 results.
Test coverage is greatly improved and template information for jobs
associated to the daemon was also fixed.
Updates #15084
Updates #15192
Related #16532
As part of the new resources monitoring logic - more specifically for
OOM & OOD Notifications , we need to update the AgentAPI , and the
agents logic.
This PR aims to do it, and more specifically :
We are updating the AgentAPI & TailnetAPI to version 24 to add two new
methods in the AgentAPI :
- One method to fetch the resources monitoring configuration
- One method to push the datapoints for the resources monitoring.
Also, this PR adds a new logic on the agent side, with a routine running
and ticking - fetching the resources usage each time , but also storing
it in a FIFO like queue.
Finally, this PR fixes a problem we had with RBAC logic on the resources
monitoring model, applying the same logic than we have for similar
entities.
Fixes https://github.com/coder/coder/issues/16268
- Adds `/api/v2/workspaceagents/:id/containers` coderd endpoint that allows listing containers
visible to the agent. Optional filtering by labels is supported.
- Adds go tools to the `coder-dylib` CI step so we can generate mocks if needed
As requested for [this
issue](https://github.com/coder/internal/issues/245) we need to have a
new resource `resources_monitoring` in the agent.
It needs to be parsed from the provisioner and inserted into a new db
table.
Kyle Carberry