mirror of
https://github.com/coder/coder.git
synced 2026-06-03 04:58:23 +00:00
321c2b8fce
The flake here had two causes: 1. related to usage of time.Now() in MustWaitForProvisionersAvailable and 2. the fact that UpdateProvisionerLastSeenAt can not use a time that is further in the past than the current LastSeenAt time Previously the test here was calling `coderdtest.MustWaitForProvisionersAvailable` which was using `time.Now` rather than the next tick time like the real `hasProvisionersAvailable` function does. Additionally, when using `UpdateProvisionerLastSeenAt` the underlying db query enforces that the time we're trying to set `LastSeenAt` to cannot be older than the current value. I was able to reliably reproduce the flake by executing both the `UpdateProvisionerLastSeenAt` call and `tickCh <- next` in their own goroutines, the former with a small sleep to reliably ensure we'd trigger the autobuild before we set the `LastSeenAt` time. That's when I also noticed that `coderdtest.MustWaitForProvisionersAvailable` was using `time.Now` instead of the tick time. When I updated that function to take in a tick time + added a 2nd call to `UpdateProvisionerLastSeenAt` to set an original non-stale time, we could then never get the test to pass because the later call to set the stale time would not actually modify `LastSeenAt`. On top of that, calling the provisioner daemons closer in the middle of the function doesn't really do anything of value in this test. **The fix for the flake is to keep the go routines, ensuring there would be a flake if there was not a relevant fix, but to include the fix which is to ensure that we explicitly wait for the provisioner to be stale before passing the time to `tickCh`.** --------- Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>